USPTO serial 86328670
IONIC ARMOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SABLE, ERIC
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with IONIC ARMOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Alan E. Schiavelli
ALAN E SCHIAVELLI FITCH EVEN TABIN & FLANNERY LLP1250 23RD STREET NW SUITE 410WASHINGTON, DC 20037-1164UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Antimicrobial composition containing nanosilver for forming micro-coating that inhibits the growth of microorganisms in skates, cleats, shoes, protective pads, gloves, clothing and other athletic gear and apparel | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 31, 2015 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 31, 2015 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 31, 2015 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 31, 2015 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 14, 2015 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 3, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 15, 2015 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 17, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 25, 2015 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 7, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 5, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 4, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 4, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 28, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 14, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 14, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 8, 2014 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Oct 7, 2014 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Oct 7, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 9, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 7, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |