Drawing for GPT

USPTO serial 86329882

GPT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RHIM, ANDREW
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GPT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Aaron Shechet

AARON SHECHET CHANDLER & SHECHET, LLP1844 BAGLEY AVELOS ANGELES, CA 90035-4111UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer application software and downloadable software in the nature of mobile applications for handheld computers, digital electronic devices, wireless electronic devices, and internet-capable electronic devices that allows users to manage and direct remotely-stored data; Computer application software and downloadable software for handheld computers, digital electronic devices, wireless electronic devices, and internet-capable electronic devices for tracking, displaying, and sharing of the location of individuals; computer software, namely, for data processing; portable computers with a mobile communication featureACTIVE—
038Transmission and distribution of data and audio visual images via a global computer network or the internetACTIVE—
042Design and development of computer hardware and softwareACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 8, 2016MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 8, 2016ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 7, 2015NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 12, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 12, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 22, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 7, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 6, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 1, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 1, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 26, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 19, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 17, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 17, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 17, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 16, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 11, 2014MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Jul 10, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 10, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance