Drawing for BIG BLIND POKER

USPTO serial 86330208

BIG BLIND POKER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FATHY, DOMINIC
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BIG BLIND POKER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Paul J Mirowski

PAUL J MIROWSKI MIROWSKI & ASSOCIATES7939 Windsor DrLa Mesa, CA 91941UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028Gaming equipment and playing card game accessories, namely, poker and gaming chips, playing cards, card guards, gaming tables, mats for poker tables, dice, dice cups, gaming machines and gaming headsets adapted for use in playing video gamesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 1, 2015MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Jun 30, 2015ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jun 17, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 16, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 16, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 16, 2015TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 24, 2015ATRVATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 13, 2015DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Mar 12, 2015AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jan 22, 2015ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Dec 18, 2014DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Dec 18, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 18, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 18, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 18, 2014ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Nov 18, 2014PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Nov 4, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 3, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 17, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 16, 2014XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Oct 16, 2014GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 16, 2014GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 16, 2014CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 16, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 11, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 10, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance