Drawing for BIGGER BUDS

USPTO serial 86331313

BIGGER BUDS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RINGLE, JAMES W
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with BIGGER BUDS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Karl E. Gustafson

KARL E. GUSTAFSON MCMILLAN LLP1500-1055 West Georgia StreetPO Box 11117, Royal CentreVancouver, BC, V6E4N7

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Plant nutrientsACTIVEMar 31, 2015

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 10, 2019TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 27, 2017MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 27, 2017ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 1, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 1, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 1, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 8, 2016AAUANOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED—
Oct 7, 2016IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Oct 5, 2016AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Oct 5, 2016IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Oct 4, 2016EAAUTEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED—
Oct 3, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 3, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 3, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 1, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 1, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 1, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 22, 2016ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Apr 6, 2016GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 6, 2016GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 6, 2016CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Oct 6, 2015GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 6, 2015GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 6, 2015CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Oct 5, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 5, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 28, 2015ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Sep 25, 2015GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 25, 2015GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 25, 2015CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Mar 25, 2015GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 25, 2015GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 25, 2015CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 25, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 25, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 23, 2015ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Mar 19, 2015GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 19, 2015GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 19, 2015CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Sep 18, 2014GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 18, 2014GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 18, 2014CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Sep 17, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 17, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 16, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 12, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 14, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 14, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 14, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 11, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 12, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 11, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance