USPTO serial 86331584
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mohammad S. Rahman
Mohammad S. Rahman RAHMAN LLC5850 Waterloo RoadSuite 140COLUMBIA, MD 21045| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Edible shortening; liquid fry shortening; edible oil; sunflower oil; soy-based liquid frying oil; canola oil; solid shortening; frying shortening; vegetable fry shortening; animal fry shortening; donut fry shortening; lard; vegetable shortening; cake shortening; pie shortening; danish shortening; salad oil; canola salad oil; olive oil; canola oil; corn oil; corn salad oil; cottonseed salad oil; peanut oil; soybean salad oil; liquid margarine; coconut oil; liquid baking release, namely, oil-based cooking spray; liquid baking release, namely, vegetable-based cooking spray; liquid butter; soy based liquid butter; sodium free butter; liquid butter with garlic; bun toasting corn oil; salted butter; unsalted butter; whipped butter; firm butter; butter and margarine blend; multi-colored butter blend; multicolored margarine blend; solid butter; butter pats; butter chips; butter; margarine pats; unsalted margarine; margarine; garlic spread; soft margarine; margarine spread; whipped margarine; margarine blend; liquid garlic margarine; firm margarine; whipped margarine oil; white margarine non-dairy margarine; roll-in margarine; flavored spreadable margarine; pastry margarine; frozen vegetables | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Mayonnaise; edible dressing, namely, coleslaw dressing and salad dressing; flavored salad dressing; salad dressing; light salad dressing; fat free salad dressing; salad dressings, namely, ranch dressing, blue cheese dressing, French with honey dressing, creamy dressing, Italian dressing, honey dressing, Caesar dressing, balsamic vinaigrette dressing, vinaigrette dressing, Caribbean vinaigrette dressing, Cabernet vinaigrette dressing, raspberry vinaigrette dressing, sesame oriental dressing, parmesan peppercorn dressing, 1000 island dressing, 1001 island dressing, French dressing, ranch with hot sauce dressing, honey mustard dressing, Dijon dressing, Dijon honey mustard dressing, buttermilk ranch dressing, kahlena French dressing, oriental dressing, poppy seed dressing, and garlic balsamic vinaigrette dressing; cole slaw dressing; tartar sauce; cocktail sauce; edible sauce; taco sauce; barbeque sauce; jalapeno sauce; jalapeno salsa; picante salsa; sweet and sour sauce; soy sauce; vinegar and spice sauce; condiments, namely, ketchup; mustard; hot mustard; relish; corn syrup; honey; rice; parboiled rice; long grain rice; basmati rice; wheat flour, whole wheat flour; sugar; French mustard; yellow mustard; light mayonnaise; Vegetable icing; honey spread; frozen breads | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 1, 2020 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 1, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 1, 2020 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 1, 2020 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 1, 2020 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| May 31, 2016 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 30, 2016 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 27, 2015 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 1, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 1, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 12, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 27, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 27, 2015 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 27, 2015 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2015 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2015 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 23, 2015 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 30, 2015 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jun 17, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 17, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 29, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 25, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 23, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 23, 2015 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 27, 2015 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2015 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 27, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 4, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 3, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 3, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 8, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 9, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 9, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 9, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 7, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 15, 2014 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 11, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |