Drawing for TE1 - TITANIUM EDGE

USPTO serial 86331849

TE1 - TITANIUM EDGE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TAYLOR, DAVID T
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with TE1 - TITANIUM EDGE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kent E. Baldauf

KENT E. BALDAUF THE WEBB LAW FIRM420 FORT DUQUESNE BLVD STE 1200PITTSBURGH, PA 15222-2803UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
008Kitchen knives, namely, paring knives, boning knives, utility knives, slicer knives, Santoku knives, chef knives; kitchen shears; knife sharpeners, namely, sharpening steelsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 16, 2015MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 15, 2015ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 17, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 17, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 17, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 23, 2015ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Feb 17, 2015PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Feb 4, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 4, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 16, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 16, 2015XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 16, 2015GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 16, 2015GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 16, 2015CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 2, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 2, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 2, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 23, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 15, 2014MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Jul 14, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 12, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance