Drawing for FOOT GUARD

USPTO serial 86332060

FOOT GUARD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DUBRAY, KATHERINE M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FOOT GUARD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kathryn Jennison Shultz

KATHRYN JENNISON SHULTZ JENNISON & SHULTZ, P.C.2001 JEFFERSON DAVIS HWY STE 1102ARLINGTON, VA 22202-3618UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003NON-MEDICATED SKIN CARE PREPARATIONS; INGREDIENT THAT PROVIDES A BARRIER THAT REDUCES FRICTION FROM RUBBING THAT CAUSES SKIN IRRITATION RANGING FROM CHAFING TO BLISTERS TO RAW SKIN SOLD AS AN INGREDIENT IN NON-MEDICATED SKIN CARE PREPARATIONSACTIVE—
005MEDICATED SKIN CARE PREPARATIONS; INGREDIENT THAT PROVIDES A BARRIER THAT REDUCES FRICTION FROM RUBBING THAT CAUSES SKIN IRRITATION RANGING FROM CHAFING TO BLISTERS TO RAW SKIN SOLD AS AN INGREDIENT IN IN MEDICATED SKIN CARE PREPARATIONSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 30, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 30, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 9, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Jan 8, 2018EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Dec 6, 2017EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Dec 6, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 2, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
May 31, 2017EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
May 31, 2017EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
May 31, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 14, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Dec 13, 2016EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Nov 30, 2016EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Nov 30, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 19, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Jul 18, 2016EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 16, 2016AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jun 13, 2016EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 13, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 2, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Nov 30, 2015EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 30, 2015EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 30, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 23, 2015NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 28, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 8, 2015NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 21, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 18, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 27, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 26, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 25, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 25, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 2, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 30, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 23, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 14, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 12, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance