Drawing for THE NANNY WHISPERER

USPTO serial 86332576

THE NANNY WHISPERER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SHIH, SALLY
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE NANNY WHISPERER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Philip J. Foret

EDWARD F BEHM JR DILWORTH PAXSON LLP1500 MARKET STSTE 3500EPHILADELPHIA, PA 19102-2101

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041personal and life coaching in the field of parenting and childcareACTIVEJan 6, 2015
044psychological counseling to assist in the selection and retention of a child care provider; providing information in the field of psychological counseling to assist in the selection and retention of a child care providerACTIVEJan 6, 2015
045counseling in the field of personal and relational development, namely, self-improvement and interpersonal communication; providing information on nanny services; mediation of disputes involving family members and between parents and guardians and child careACTIVEJan 6, 2015

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 24, 2018MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 23, 2018ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 23, 2018EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 21, 2018EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Dec 8, 2017EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Dec 8, 2017EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jun 8, 2017CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 7, 2017CNFRSU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 2, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 2, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 26, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 3, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 3, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 2, 2016CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 24, 2016SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Oct 24, 2016AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Oct 10, 2016IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Oct 10, 2016EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Aug 25, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Aug 23, 2016EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 23, 2016EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 23, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 23, 2016NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 29, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 9, 2015NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 9, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 6, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 6, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 6, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 13, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 12, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 21, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 21, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 21, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 21, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 20, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 20, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 15, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 12, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance