USPTO serial 86333880
AIRTIGHT MULTI-FAMILY ENERGY REDUCTION DIVISION OF LAPOLLA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5317395Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 24, 2017
- Examiner
- ZIMMERMAN, GAYNNE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with AIRTIGHT MULTI-FAMILY ENERGY REDUCTION DIVISION OF LAPOLLA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
HUNTSMAN BUILDING SOLUTIONS (USA) LLC
THE WOODLANDS, TX
Other trademarks owned by HUNTSMAN BUILDING SOLUTIONS (USA) LLC
Houston, TX
Houston, TX
Houston, TX
HOUSTON, TX
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daniel S. Polley
DANIEL S. POLLEY DANIEL S. POLLEY, P. A.7251 W PALMETTO PARK RD STE 202BOCA RATON, FL 33433-3487UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Promoting public awareness of energy reduction; promoting public awareness of energy savings through an energy reduction program; promoting public awareness of multi-family energy reduction through an energy-reduction program; promoting public awareness of multi-family energy savings through an energy-reduction program; energy usage management services; consulting services in the field of energy usage management; technical consulting services in the field of energy usage management and energy efficiency | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 1, 2014 |
| 037 | Installation of foam insulating materials; boiler and hot water heaters installation services; building maintenance and repair consultation services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 1, 2014 |
| 042 | Consulting services in the field of energy measurement to improve energy efficiency | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 1, 2014 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by HUNTSMAN BUILDING SOLUTIONS (USA) LLC
- Other trademarks owned by LaPolla Industries, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by LaPolla Industries, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by LaPolla Industries, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by LAPOLLA INDUSTRIES, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named AIRTIGHT MULTI-FAMILY ENERGY REDUCTION DIVISION OF LAPOLLA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 10, 2024 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Nov 25, 2022 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 24, 2022 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2018 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 7, 2018 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 24, 2017 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 20, 2017 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2017 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 7, 2017 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 5, 2017 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 15, 2017 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2017 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Feb 18, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2017 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 16, 2017 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 16, 2016 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 21, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 1, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 11, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 6, 2016 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 6, 2016 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 6, 2016 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 6, 2016 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 5, 2016 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 5, 2016 | PBSR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - SENIOR ATTORNEY REQUEST | — |
| May 2, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 22, 2016 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 22, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 19, 2016 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 14, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 14, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 12, 2016 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 7, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 7, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 5, 2016 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 5, 2016 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 5, 2016 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 5, 2016 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 5, 2015 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2015 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 5, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 22, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 19, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 18, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 18, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 18, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 16, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 16, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 1, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 15, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 9, 2014 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 9, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 8, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 17, 2014 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 14, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |