Drawing for NPAM

USPTO serial 86333908

NPAM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LEIPZIG, MARC J
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NPAM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Thomas D. Herman

THOMAS D. HERMAN SMITH DUGGAN BUELL & RUFO LLP99 Summer Street, Suite 1530BOSTON, MA 02110-1248UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Wearable devices for use in training and coaching sporting, recreational, and fitness activities, namely, for use in measuring and monitoring physical activity levels by means of multi-axis acceleration sensors and data processors, and software incorporated therein, and for use in electronically measuring and analyzing the output from such sensors and calculating the user's posture, movement, step count, activity-related caloric expenditure, and other measures of activity levelsACTIVE—
010Wearable devices for medical diagnostic and therapeutic use, for use in measuring and monitoring physical activity levels by means of multi-axis acceleration sensors and data processors, and software incorporated therein, and for use in electronically measuring and analyzing the output from such sensors and calculating the user's posture, movement, step count, activity-related caloric expenditure, and other measures of activity levelsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 17, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 17, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 21, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 20, 2017EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jan 13, 2017NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Jan 12, 2017TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Jan 12, 2017PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jan 12, 2017PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Dec 16, 2016EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jul 23, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 22, 2016EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 20, 2016AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jun 15, 2016EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 15, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 17, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 15, 2015EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 15, 2015EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 15, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 15, 2015TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 16, 2015NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 21, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 21, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 1, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Mar 13, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 12, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 12, 2015XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 12, 2015GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 12, 2015GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 12, 2015CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 12, 2015ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Mar 10, 2015PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Feb 24, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 23, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 12, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 12, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 4, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 26, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 21, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 27, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 27, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 27, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 21, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 16, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 14, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance