Drawing for "KISS"AVERSARY

USPTO serial 86334046

"KISS"AVERSARY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ALTREE, NICHOLAS
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with "KISS"AVERSARY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JOANNA Y. TSAI

JOANNA Y TSAI JYTLAW4391 MIDDLESEX DRSAN DIEGO, CA 92116-2141UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Beverages made of tea; beverages with a tea base; flavourings of tea; fruit teas; tapioca; tapioca flour; tapioca pearls; tea-based beverages with fruit flavoringACTIVEFeb 1, 2015

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 11, 2016MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 11, 2016ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 11, 2016EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 29, 2016EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jun 8, 2016EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 8, 2016JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 8, 2016EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jun 5, 2016RDX3NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED—
Jun 5, 2016RDX1ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED—
Jun 5, 2016RRDXACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED—
Jun 3, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 3, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 31, 2016ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
May 17, 2016RDX3NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED—
May 17, 2016RDX1ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED—
May 17, 2016RRDXACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED—
May 2, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 2, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 27, 2016ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Dec 8, 2015GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Dec 8, 2015GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 8, 2015CNFRSU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 7, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 7, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 19, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 2, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 20, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 20, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 20, 2015CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 16, 2015SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jun 15, 2015AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
May 18, 2015IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
May 18, 2015EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Jan 27, 2015NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 2, 2014NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 2, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 12, 2014NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Oct 22, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 21, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 16, 2014ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 16, 2014REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 17, 2014MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Jul 16, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 14, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance