USPTO serial 86334119
CONTEXCONTROL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MEIER, SHARON A
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CONTEXCONTROL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Software for network management; software for communications and computer networks, software based networks solutions and media networking solutions; software for encryption and data protection; software to improve calculation efficiency, acceleration, arrangement, deployment and management of communications systems, computing systems, servers, networks and networks based on software and switches; computer software for control, management, monitoring, reporting and analysis of issues and information concerning computer networks, databases, usage patterns, end user data, subscriber data, anomalies and potential faults; computer hardware for network management, namely, components and switches for transmitting and receiving communications over all types of systems for communications and for computer networks; computer hardware to improve calculation efficiency, acceleration, arrangement, deployment and management of communications systems, computing systems, servers, networks, networks based on software and switches | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Business information services; providing consumer information relating to computer software products, and software services, hardware, and computer networks; advertising services; business management; business administration services; marketing services; online information services, namely, the provision of business strategic planning information in the field of high technology, communications and information technology; database management, namely, managing computerized databases, electronic files and data; data processing services in the field of consumption and use data with respect to computer and communications networks; business data analysis in the field of consumption and use data with respect to computer and communication networks; collection of data for business purposes in the field of consumption and use data with respect to computer and communications networks; collection of market research information, namely, market research services in the field of computer and communications networks; business and marketing consultancy, advisory and information services with respect to computer hardware, computer software and computer networks; retail stores and online retail stores featuring software, software applications, hardware, and communication networks for others; optimization services for communication networks, namely, consulting services in the field of search engine optimization, web site optimization and web site traffic optimization; online retail distributorship services featuring software, software applications, computer and communications hardware and communication networks, for others | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Communications services over computer networks, namely, electronic transmission of data and documents among users of computer networks; communication services based on software, namely, electronic transmission of data and documents among users of computer networks; electronic data transmission services between networked computer systems; communication via fiber optic networks | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Design and testing of computers, computer software, computer networks and software-defined networks for others; research in the field of computers, computer software, computer networks and software-defined networks; computer technology consultancy; computer networking consultancy; consulting in the field of software-defined networks; networking services based on software, namely, design, deployment and management of software-defined networks for others; industrial research in the field of computers, computer software, computer networks and software-defined networks; computer system analysis; computer network analysis; computer programming of computer software and applications for others in the field of computing and communication systems and networks; design and implementation of software, software applications, communication networks and related components and features, for others; computer programming of computer software and applications for networked computing and communication systems; design of new products, components and features for others; software design, development of software, and software programming, for others; research in the field of computer software and communication networks, for others; consultancy services relating to communication networks, software and applications; maintenance, installation and repair of computer software; computer and communication networks diagnostic services; consultancy services in the field of selection, implementation and use of software, communication networks, applications and computer systems; electronic storage and electronic retrieval of documents, data, files, images, audio and video, for others | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CONTEXTREAM LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE DEVELOPMENT LP
- Other trademarks owned by HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE DEVELOPMENT LP
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named CONTEXCONTROL
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 5, 2017 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 5, 2017 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 19, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2016 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 17, 2016 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 25, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 25, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 3, 2016 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 8, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 17, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 1, 2016 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 1, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 1, 2016 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 1, 2016 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2016 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2016 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 25, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 25, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 25, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 7, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 7, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 30, 2015 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 30, 2015 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 30, 2015 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 30, 2015 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 25, 2015 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 20, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 20, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 2, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 2, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 30, 2015 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 30, 2015 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 30, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 6, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 6, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 24, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 23, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 3, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 3, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 3, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 21, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 16, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 14, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |