USPTO serial 86334656
FILL THE BINS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TENG, SIMON
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FILL THE BINS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
FT. LAUDERDALE, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RICHARD L MORRIS JR ESQ
RICHARD L MORRIS JR ESQ TRADEMARKRENEWALS.COMPO BOX 398538MIAMI BEACH, FL 33239-8538UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | Collection of clothing, purses, shoes, belts and jewelry accessories for recycling; Recycling services, namely, collection of clothing, purses, shoes, belts and jewelry accessories for redistribution to various entities, including domestic and international charities, thrift stores, wholesalers and retailers; Recycling services, namely, collection, removal and disposal of clothing, purses, shoes, belts and jewelry accessories for redistribution to various entities, including charities, thrift stores, wholesalers and retailers | ACTIVE | Mar 12, 2015 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 27, 2015 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Oct 27, 2015 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Mar 31, 2015 | RDX3 | NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2015 | RDX1 | ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2015 | RRDX | ACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 25, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 25, 2015 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 24, 2015 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2015 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 24, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 20, 2015 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2015 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 18, 2015 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 18, 2015 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2015 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 17, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 17, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 17, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 27, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 27, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 27, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 22, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 17, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 15, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |