Drawing for VOLO

USPTO serial 86335252

VOLO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CAPSHAW, DANIEL
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VOLO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David Chen

DAVID CHEN DWC LAW FIRM, P.S.PO BOX 3041SEATTLE, WA 98114-3041UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Protective covers and protective cases for tablet computers, laptops and portable media players; Computer carrying cases; battery chargers for computers, tablet computers, and laptops; Power adapters for computers, tablet computers, and laptops; wireless battery charging devices for computers, tablet computers, and laptops; wireless battery charging devices for electrical equipment, namely, tablet computers and laptops; wired and wireless charging appliances for rechargeable equipment, namely, for computers, tablet computers, and laptopsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 19, 2016MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 19, 2016ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 19, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 17, 2016EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 17, 2016EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 17, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 18, 2015NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 23, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 23, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 3, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
May 20, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 20, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 20, 2015XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 19, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 19, 2015GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 19, 2015GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 19, 2015CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 28, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 27, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 27, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 25, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 25, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 25, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 22, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 17, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 15, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance