Drawing for MOON CITY

USPTO serial 86335931

MOON CITY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
HELLMAN, ELI J
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MOON CITY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

KRISTIANNE NABONG

KRISTIANNE NABONG SCIENTIFIC GAMES CORPORATION3401 N. CALIFORNIACHICAGO, IL 60618UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028Slot Machines; gambling machines; electronic gaming machines; replacement parts for all the foregoing; and gaming machine bonus games sold as an integral component of the aforementioned machinesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 7, 2022ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY
Nov 21, 2018ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY
Jul 25, 2016MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 25, 2016ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 22, 2015NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 27, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Oct 27, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 7, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Sep 22, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Sep 21, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Aug 25, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Aug 25, 2015XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Aug 25, 2015GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Aug 25, 2015GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Aug 25, 2015CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Jul 23, 2015ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 23, 2015REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Apr 19, 2015GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Apr 19, 2015GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 19, 2015CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 19, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Mar 19, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 19, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 10, 2014ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY
Oct 30, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 30, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 30, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 23, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jul 17, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance