Drawing for EPLAY

USPTO serial 86337371

EPLAY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TWOHIG, SHANNON MARIE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 121

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EPLAY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Alicia Brown Oliver

ALICIA BROWN OLIVER CHAMBLISS605 CHESTNUT ST STE 1700CHATTANOOGA, TN 37450-0019UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035wholesale distributorships of playground, recreation, fitness and sports equipment; providing an internet website portal featuring playground, recreation, fitness and sports equipment for retail and wholesale purposesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 6, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 6, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 24, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 23, 2016EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 19, 2016AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jul 26, 2016EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 26, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 7, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 5, 2016EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 5, 2016EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 5, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 28, 2015NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 27, 2015NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 2, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 2, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 13, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 28, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 24, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 1, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 13, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 13, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 13, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 28, 2014GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Oct 28, 2014GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Oct 28, 2014CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Oct 27, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 22, 2014MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Jul 21, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 18, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance