USPTO serial 86338610
DRIVE BI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCDORMAN, ROGER THOMAS
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DRIVE BI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Matthew E. Moersfelder
MATTHEW E. MOERSFELDER DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP1201 3RD AVE STE 2200SEATTLE, WA 98101-3045UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business consulting services, namely, providing advice and information on cloud-based database management, to identify actions to increase sales and profitability and business management methodologies; customer engagement services, namely, providing data captured via kiosks in the nature of customer surveys, marketing, menu/ordering and social media sign-ups for use in the field of business analytics data management and customer engagement methodologies; employee engagement services, namely, providing data captured via kiosks in the nature of customer surveys, marketing, menu/ordering and social media sign-ups for use in the field of business analytics data management, and employee engagement methodologies; business management and customer retention consultation services in the field of cloud-based database management | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Educational services, namely, providing webinars, seminars, video casts and tutorials in the field of business analytics data management, customer and employee engagement methodologies | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Software as a service (SAAS), namely, providing online access to computer software to assist others to collect, analyse and report business data, namely, sales, margins, customers, employee, marketing, promotions, market intelligence, industry benchmarks, community contributions, sustainability and financial data to be used in cloud-based database management, to identify actions to increase sales and profitability and for business management methodologies; cloud-based computing services featuring software for use in database management, in the field of customer retention, employee engagement and marketing management | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Drive Business Intelligence Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Drive Business Intelligence Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named DRIVE BI
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 17, 2016 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 17, 2016 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 15, 2016 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 19, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 30, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 9, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 9, 2015 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 9, 2015 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2015 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2015 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 1, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 1, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 30, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 6, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 28, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 28, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 28, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 5, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 4, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 4, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 3, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 3, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 3, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 28, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 23, 2014 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 19, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |