USPTO serial 86338720
SAFE BRANDS SAFE ALLERGEN FREE ENVIRONMENT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- I, DAVID C
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SAFE BRANDS SAFE ALLERGEN FREE ENVIRONMENT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
North Caldwell, NJ
North Caldwell, NJ
Fairfield, NJ
FAIRFIELD, NJ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Heather E Balmat
HEATHER E BALMAT BALMAT LAW, PLLC977 SEMINOLE TRL # 342CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22901-2824UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Dried fruit-based snacks; Fruit chips; Kale chips; Milk drinks containing fruits; Nut and seed-based snack bars; Nut- and dried fruit- based snack bars; Nut-based snack bars; Organic nut and seed-based snack bars; Potato chips; Potato-based snack foods; Seed-based snack bars; Snack mix consisting of dehydrated fruit and processed nuts; Vegetable chips; Vegetable-based snack foods; Yogurt drinks; frozen meals consisting primarily of meat, fish, poultry or vegetables, all produced in an allergen free environment | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Bagel chips; Breakfast cereals; Cereal bars; Cereal based energy bars; Cereal based snack food; Cheese flavored puffed corn snacks; Cheese flavored snacks, namely, cheese curls; Cheese flavored snacks, namely, puffed cheese balls; Coffee; Coffee-based beverage containing milk; Coffee-based beverages; Coffee-based iced beverages; Cookies; Corn chips; Corn-based chips; Crackers; Flour-based chips; Grain-based chips; Granola; Granola snacks; Granola-based snack bars; High-protein cereal bars; Pita chips; Pretzel chips; Pretzels; Quinoa-based snack foods; Rice-based snack foods; Snack mix consisting primarily of crackers, pretzels and/or popped popcorn; Tortilla chips; Yogurt-covered pretzels; frozen meals consisting primarily of pasta or rice, all produced in an allergen free environment | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | Cola drinks; Fruit drinks and fruit juices; Non-alcoholic beverages containing fruit juices; Vegetable drinks; Vegetable-fruit juices, all produced in an allergen free environment | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by LJ Foods, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by LJ Foods, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by SAFE Brands, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by SAFE BRANDS, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named SAFE BRANDS SAFE ALLERGEN FREE ENVIRONMENT
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 5, 2018 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 5, 2018 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 21, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2018 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 28, 2018 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 23, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2017 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 21, 2017 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 7, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2017 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 5, 2017 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 29, 2017 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 7, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2016 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 26, 2016 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 31, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 28, 2016 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 27, 2016 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 13, 2016 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2016 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Apr 13, 2016 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 13, 2016 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 29, 2016 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2015 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 4, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 15, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 29, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 11, 2015 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 11, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 11, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 11, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 11, 2015 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 11, 2015 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 10, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 9, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 5, 2014 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Nov 5, 2014 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Nov 5, 2014 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Oct 28, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 24, 2014 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 19, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |