CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for SMARTZYME

USPTO serial 86338828

SMARTZYME

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FATHY, DOMINIC
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SMARTZYME?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

William W. Stroever

WILLIAM W. STROEVER GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP200 PARK AVE STE 104FLORHAM PARK, NJ 07932-1092UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Enzymes for use in glucose testing for scientific and research purposesACTIVE—
005Test strips for measuring blood glucose levels; Enzymes for use in glucose testing for medical purposesACTIVE—
010Devices for monitoring blood glucose for medical purposesACTIVE—
045Licensing of intellectual propertyACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 17, 2016MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 17, 2016ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 15, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 14, 2016EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Apr 11, 2016AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Mar 10, 2016EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 10, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 20, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 18, 2015EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 18, 2015EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 18, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 10, 2015NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 13, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 13, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 24, 2014NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Dec 8, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 8, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 24, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 20, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 19, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 19, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 31, 2014GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Oct 31, 2014GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Oct 31, 2014CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Oct 28, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 23, 2014MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Jul 22, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 19, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance