USPTO serial 86339012
CSUITE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HOWARD, PARKER WALDRIP
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 117
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CSUITE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jerald E. Nagae, Reg. No. 29,418
JERALD E. NAGAE, REG. NO. 29,418 CHRISTENSEN O'CONNOR JOHNSON KINDNESS1201 3RD AVE STE 3600SEATTLE, WA 98101-3268UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business analytics services to enable and assist businesses to gather, organize, combine and analyze data from multiple sources for analyzing business performance and identifying and monitoring factors affecting business performance; providing consultation and analysis regarding business analytics to enable and assist businesses to gather, organize, combine and analyze data from multiple sources for analyzing business performance and identifying and monitoring factors affecting business performance | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Web site design, development, implementation, management, hosting, maintenance, monitoring, and performance analysis and review; application service provider, namely, hosting, managing, developing, analyzing, and maintaining applications, software, and web sites of others in the fields of advertising and marketing and mobile information access; providing consultation and analysis regarding web site design, development, implementation, management, hosting, maintenance, monitoring, and performance analysis and review; providing consultation and analysis regarding web application and web ecommerce application and site design, development, implementation, management, hosting, maintenance, monitoring, and performance analysis and review | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 19, 2016 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Dec 19, 2016 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2016 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 21, 2016 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 20, 2015 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 6, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 5, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 2, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 1, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 1, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 1, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 28, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 23, 2014 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 19, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |