Drawing for CLASS 1

USPTO serial 86339523

CLASS 1

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MCMORROW, JANICE LEE
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CLASS 1?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Pattric J. Rawlins

Pattric J. Rawlins PROCOPIO CORY HARGREAVES & SAVITCH LLP525 B Street, Suite 2200SAN DIEGO, CA 92101UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Sunglasses and protective eyewear; goggles for motorsports; protective gear for motorsports, namely, protective helmets and protective gloves; articles of protective clothing with built in armor for protection against accident or injury for use in motorsports and off-road racing; computer application software for electronic, mobile and wireless devices for providing information on motorsports; digital media, namely, downloadable mobile software applications for use on mobile and wireless devices and portable multimedia viewing devices and terminals featuring information on motorsports; downloadable electronic publications in the nature of newspaper, magazine, newsletters, journals, articles, booklets, brochures, pamphlets, reference guides, circulars, bulletins in the field of motorsports; audio and video recordings in the field of motorsports; computer game software and programs, cartridges, discs, video game cartridges in the field of motorsports; computer software for playing video games and computer games with others via a global computer or communication network and for accessing and browsing global computer and communication networks; computer programs, namely, game software for use on computers and video game devices; graduated plastic rulersACTIVE—
028Games and playthings, namely, ride-on plastic cars, trucks, dune buggies and off road vehicles, battery operated pinball machines, board games, miniature cars, miniature trucks, electronic driving games, electronic motorsports racing sets, electronic slot cars, plastic action figures, miniature trophies, plastic model cars, trucks, dune buggies and off road vehicles, plastic wall racers, plush stuffed animals, pool cues, puzzles, radio control cars, trucks, dune buggies and off-road vehiclesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 23, 2022CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Aug 23, 2022TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 23, 2022EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
Aug 23, 2022ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 23, 2022REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 23, 2022COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jun 5, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 5, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 29, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 28, 2016EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Oct 24, 2016EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Oct 24, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 26, 2016NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Jul 26, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 25, 2016EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 25, 2016DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jul 8, 2016IROARESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED—
Jul 8, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 16, 2016INCDITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST—
Jun 12, 2016AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
May 5, 2016EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 5, 2016DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
May 5, 2016ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
May 5, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 5, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 5, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 18, 2015CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Dec 18, 2015COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Dec 3, 2015TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 7, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 5, 2015EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 5, 2015EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 5, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 5, 2015TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 5, 2015EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
May 5, 2015NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 10, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 10, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 18, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Feb 2, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 2, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 2, 2015XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 2, 2015GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 2, 2015GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 2, 2015CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 1, 2015ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jan 20, 2015PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Jan 7, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 7, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 7, 2015XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 7, 2015GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 7, 2015GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 7, 2015CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 7, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 7, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 7, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 31, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 2, 2014GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Nov 2, 2014GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Nov 2, 2014CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Oct 28, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 23, 2014MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Jul 22, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 19, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance