USPTO serial 86340212
COLOUR THERAPY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HOFFMAN, DAVID AARON
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with COLOUR THERAPY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
St AlbansHertfordshire, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David G. Oberdick
DAVID G. OBERDICK MEYER, UNKOVIC & SCOTT LLP535 SMITHFIELD ST STE 1300PITTSBURGH, PA 15222-2300UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | Electrical hair styling products and hair styling apparatus, namely, electric irons for styling hair, electric hair straightening irons, electric hair straighteners, electric hand-held hair styling irons, electric hair styling wands, electric brushes; electrical hair curling irons; electrical hair straightening apparatus and instruments; electrical hair straightening irons; electrical hair tongs; electrical hair waving tongs, wands and irons; electrically heated appliances for curling and styling hair namely, electrically heated irons for styling hair, electrically heated hair straightening irons, electrically heated hair straighteners, electrically heated hand-held hair styling irons, electrically heated hair styling wands, electrically heated brushes; electric hair crimpers; electric hair clippers; scissors; hairdressing scissors; nail scissors; razors; tweezers; nail files; manicure sets; pedicure sets; parts and fittings for all the aforesaid goods; all the aforementioned goods excluding hair care preparations, namely, shampoo and conditioner, shampoo for color-treated hair, protective shine spray, and hair treatment preparations | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | Hair dryers; whirlpool baths; parts and fittings for all the aforesaid goods; all the aforementioned goods excluding hair care preparations, namely, shampoo and conditioner, shampoo for color-treated hair, protective shine spray, and hair treatment preparations | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Hair combs; hair brushes; eyelash combs; cases for combs and brushes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 18, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 18, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 8, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 20, 2015 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 20, 2015 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 20, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 30, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 30, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 30, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 30, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 30, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 30, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 29, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 24, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 21, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |