USPTO serial 86340321
EYEROVER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 605
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICKLEBURGH, LINDA BOHANNON
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EYEROVER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michelle L. Mehok
MICHELLE L. MEHOK PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLP12255 EL CAMINO REAL STE 300SAN DIEGO, CA 92130-4088UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Robots for personal, educational, and hobby use and structural parts therefor; robots for commercial tactical use and structural parts therefor; computer network interface devices; computer interface boards; interfaces and peripheral devices for computers; circuit boards; software for controlling robotics and robots; tactical robots; tactical task robots; manipulators for the remote control of robotic arms; robots for consumer task use, namely, robotic arm robots for personal use and structural parts therefor; operating system programs for robots; robots having visual perception, motor control and autonomous navigation for personal, educational and hobby use and structural parts therefor; robots having visual perception, motor control and autonomous navigation for commercial tactical use and structural parts therefor; robots having human-like motion and mobility for personal, educational and hobby use and structural parts therefor; robots having human-like motion and mobility for commercial tactical use and structural parts therefor; laboratory robots for scientific laboratory use; computer interface boards; circuit boards; integrated circuits; data processors; embedded computer hardware and software for signal processing; computer software for use in database management and electronic storage of data for use with robotic machinery and systems and operating systems for robots; computer software in the nature of a contextually aware application, namely, software for using the context of a complex sensory visual or auditory input to determine actions of robotic machines within the corresponding environment | ABANDONED | — |
| 012 | Motorized, electric-powered, self-propelled, self-balancing, wheeled device which contains active stereo vision | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 1, 2015 | MAB5 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| May 1, 2015 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 28, 2015 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 4, 2015 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 6, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 17, 2014 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 4, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 15, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 14, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 13, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 13, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 5, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 5, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 5, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 29, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 25, 2014 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 21, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |