Drawing for OPENFEED

USPTO serial 86340830

OPENFEED

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KAJUBI, ELIZABETH N
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OPENFEED?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Darren S. Rimer

DARREN S RIMER RIMER & MATHEWSON LLP30021 TOMAS STE 300RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA, CA 92688-2128UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036(Based on Use in Commerce)Financial information processing; Financial information provided by electronic means; Financial services, namely, providing information in the fields of foreign currency, commodities, financial derivatives, interest rate products, and equities via the internet and intranet systems; Providing a web site that features information on the options markets; Providing financial information; Providing information in the field of financial stock and equity markets; Providing on-line news in the field of finance; Provision of financial information; Provision of information and data concerning stock exchanges; Provision of stock market information; Stock exchange price quotationsACTIVEFeb 27, 2013
042(Based on Intent to Use) Data encryption and decoding services; Data encryption services; Design and development of computer software; Design and development of software and hardware for data and multimedia content conversion from and to different protocols; Development and creation of computer programmes for data processing; Digital compression of computer dataACTIVEFeb 27, 2013

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 5, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 4, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 4, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 2, 2017EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 2, 2017EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 2, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 2, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 7, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 7, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 18, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
May 3, 2016EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 3, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 3, 2016EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 3, 2016JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 2, 2016NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
May 2, 2016PGTTPETITION GRANTED - TTAB APPEAL FILED—
Apr 21, 2016EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Apr 21, 2016ERTPTEAS RESPONSE TO PETITION DEFICIENCY RECEIVED—
Mar 22, 2016PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Mar 10, 2016APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Feb 29, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 29, 2016PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jan 4, 2016MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 3, 2016ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 16, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 15, 2015GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
May 15, 2015GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 15, 2015CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 24, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 23, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 23, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 23, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 23, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 23, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 23, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 25, 2014MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Jul 24, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 21, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance