Drawing for MYPACT

USPTO serial 86341882

MYPACT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MEYERS, MORGAN LAURA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MYPACT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Matthew J. Laskoski

MATTHEW J. LASKOSKI Porzio, Bromberg & Newman P.C.1200 New Hampshire Ave., NW, Suite 710WASHINGTON, DC 20036

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for notifying patients and caregivers of medical information and medical care instructions in the field of mental health; Computer software for scheduling patient care in the field of mental health; Computer software for monitoring and tracking patient or caregiver activities in the field of mental health; Computer software for distributing patient or caregiver information in the field of mental health; Computer software for receiving, processing, analyzing, and storing patient or caregiver information in the field of mental health; Computer software for reporting patient or caregiver information in the field of mental health; Computer software for controlling and managing patient medical information in the field of mental healthACTIVE—
044Consulting services in the field of mental health and wellnessACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 22, 2016MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 22, 2016ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 21, 2015NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 26, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 26, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 6, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 17, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 13, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 25, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 25, 2015XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 25, 2015GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 25, 2015GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 25, 2015CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 12, 2015TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 30, 2014GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Sep 30, 2014GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Sep 30, 2014CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Sep 29, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 26, 2014MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Jul 25, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 22, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance