USPTO serial 86342008
M MOZIDO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CROWLEY, PAUL
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - SENIOR ATTORNEY
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with M MOZIDO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John C. Stringham
JOHN C. STRINGHAM WORKMAN NYDEGGER60 E SOUTH TEMPLE STE 1000SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84111-1011UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Platform as a service (PAAS) featuring financial interchange computer software platforms for facilitating a full suite of mobile, digital loyalty and financial transactions and services through mobile telephone connections, interactive voice response over telephone connections, retail point-of-sale connections and the internet, namely, mobile banking, mobile money transfers, check cashing, ACH services, issuing prepaid debit cards, mobile prepaid airtime services in the nature of transferring airtime, namely, telecommunications air time brokerage services for use by others and making payments for adding airtime to prepaid or pay-as-you-go wireless services, electronic funds transfer, electronic payment services and proximity electronic payment services involving electronic processing and subsequent transmission of bill payment data, electronic credit and debit transaction processing, processing payments to third parties and bill payment services, mobile purchasing, namely, providing electronic processing of credit/debit card transactions and electronic payments via mobile phone for allowing consumers to purchase goods and services of others, mobile multichannel payments, namely, bill payment services and loan payment services, payment and ordering processing services using geofencing and proximity recognition; Platform as a service (PAAS) featuring financial services, namely, stored-value cash or debit card services, namely, loading, managing, and payment processing, provided by mobile telephone connections, interactive voice response over telephone connections, retail point-of-sale connections and the internet; Platform as a service (PAAS) featuring processing of redemption services based on consumer transaction behavior, namely, promoting the goods and services of others by issuing coupons, rewards, discounts and promotions which may then be redeemed when purchasing goods or services; Providing processing of pricing comparisons for goods and services and promotional and marketing information and offers via mobile electronic devices | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 30, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 30, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 4, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 4, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 4, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 30, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 25, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 22, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |