USPTO serial 86344160
GOD IS GOOD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BEGGS, MONICA L
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GOD IS GOOD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Baseball caps and hats; Caps; Caps with visors; Collared shirts; Graphic T-shirts; Hats; Head sweatbands; Hooded sweat shirts; Hooded sweatshirts; Shirts; Shirts and short-sleeved shirts; Small hats; Sweat bands; Sweat jackets; Sweat pants; Sweat suits; Sweatshirts; Sweatsuits; T-shirts; Women's clothing, namely, shirts | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 21, 2017 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 21, 2017 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 21, 2017 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 4, 2016 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Aug 26, 2016 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2016 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2016 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 18, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 29, 2016 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 5, 2016 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2016 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2016 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 18, 2016 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 4, 2016 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 23, 2016 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2016 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2016 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 2, 2016 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 2, 2016 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 1, 2016 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 26, 2016 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2016 | PGTT | PETITION GRANTED - TTAB APPEAL FILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2016 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jan 14, 2016 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Dec 29, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 29, 2015 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 23, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 23, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 1, 2015 | HSCD | HIDDEN SENSITIVE CONTENT | — |
| May 14, 2015 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| May 14, 2015 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| May 14, 2015 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 30, 2015 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| Apr 28, 2015 | HSCD | HIDDEN SENSITIVE CONTENT | — |
| Jan 20, 2015 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jan 15, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 13, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 13, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 5, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 5, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 5, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 16, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 16, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 16, 2014 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 16, 2014 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 10, 2014 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2014 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 10, 2014 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 20, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 20, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 19, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 13, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 4, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 4, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 4, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 4, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 30, 2014 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 25, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |