USPTO serial 86344195
PIPEONLINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ALTREE, NICHOLAS
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PIPEONLINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Okotoks, Alberta, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Timothy H. Hiebert
TIMOTHY H. HIEBERT SAMUELS & HIEBERT LLC2 INTERNATIONAL PL FL 23BOSTON, MA 02110-4106UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Computerized online services relating to the selling of pipe for industrial purposes and the selling of transportation and installation services and the storage and inventory of pipe; Consulting services relating to pipe for industrial purposes and its transportation and installation and the storage and inventory management of pipe; Information services, namely, providing on-line information in the field of pipe for industrial purposes and its transportation and installation and the storage and inventory of pipe; Computerized online services relating to customer shipping and order tracking; Transportation of pipe and pipeline equipment; stockpiling and stringing of pipe and the storage and inventory management of pipe; Logistics services relating to the receipt, storage, inventory, delivery and transportation of pipe and pipeline equipment from suppliers to purchasers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 24, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 22, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 7, 2018 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2018 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 7, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 7, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 7, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 6, 2017 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 7, 2017 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2017 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2017 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 7, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 7, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 7, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 28, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 15, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 15, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 15, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 15, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 9, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 22, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 22, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 21, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 18, 2015 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 17, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 17, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 17, 2015 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 17, 2015 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 12, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 12, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 12, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 4, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 30, 2014 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 25, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |