CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for JUNIMONG

USPTO serial 86345904

JUNIMONG

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BOONE, JOHN C
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with JUNIMONG?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Corey K. Cho

COREY K. CHO SALIWANCHIK, LLOYD & EISENSCHENKPO BOX 142950GAINESVILLE, FL 32614-2950UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028Dolls' houses; Dolls' rooms; Doll furniture; Dolls' clothes; Stuffed toys; Toy vehicles and accessories therefor; Toy figures; Toy models; Jigsaw puzzles; Game apparatus, namely, bases, bats, and balls for playing indoor and outdoor games; Play balls and play balloons; Playing cards; Toy mobiles; Scale model kits being toys; Bubble making wand and solution sets; Toy building blocksACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 10, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 10, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 22, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 21, 2016EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 6, 2016EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 6, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 12, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 12, 2016NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
May 11, 2016EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 11, 2016DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Apr 28, 2016AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Mar 5, 2016EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 5, 2016DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Mar 5, 2016ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Mar 5, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 8, 2015NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 14, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 14, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 24, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jun 5, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 4, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 12, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 11, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 10, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 10, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 10, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 10, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 10, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 5, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 31, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 26, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance