USPTO serial 86348135
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jordan A. LaVine
JORDAN A. LAVINE FLASTER/GREENBERG P.C.1600 JFK BLVD FL 2PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-2808UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for the digital display and analysis of data and business metrics, namely, computer software for business intelligence, data mining, building charts, graphs, diagrams, maps, dashboards, scorecards and reporting; computer software for training users on the functionality of computer software for the digital display and analysis of business intelligence, user data and business metrics, namely, computer software for training users on data mining and how to integrate user data into charts, graphs, diagrams, maps, dashboards, scorecards and reporting; computer software for business intelligence, data warehousing, data processing, and data transforms | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Customized computer training services on the use of computer software for the digital display and analysis of user data and business metrics, namely, business intelligence, data analysis, data mining, charts, graphs, diagrams, maps, dashboards, scorecards and reporting; computer training services in the field of computer software for business intelligence, data warehousing, data processing, and data transforms | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer software design for the digital display and analysis of user data and business metrics, namely, business intelligence, data analysis, data mining, charts, graphs, diagrams, maps, dashboards, scorecards and reporting; developing custom-built computer software for the digital display and analysis of user data and business metrics, namely, business intelligence, data analysis, data mining, charts, graphs, diagrams, maps, dashboards, scorecards and reporting; computer consulting services for the digital display and analysis of user data and business metrics, namely, business intelligence, data analysis, data mining, charts, graphs, diagrams, maps, dashboards, scorecards and reporting; computer consulting services in the field of computer software for business intelligence, data warehousing, data processing, and data transforms; design of computer software for business intelligence, data warehousing, data processing, and data transforms; computer software design; computer software project management services | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | Licensing of computer software | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 14, 2019 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Jan 14, 2019 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2019 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 31, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 31, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 31, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 15, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 15, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 15, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 11, 2018 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 2, 2018 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2018 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 30, 2018 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 27, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 8, 2017 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 1, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 27, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 27, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 17, 2017 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 23, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 23, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 23, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 20, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 19, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 19, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 17, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 2, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 2, 2015 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 1, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 11, 2015 | GRML | CORRESPONDENCE E-MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 11, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 11, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 11, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 13, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 13, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 13, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 7, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 4, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 29, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |