USPTO serial 86348273
BABY GOT CURVES!
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HERRERA-MARCUS, ROSELLE MORALDE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 100 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BABY GOT CURVES!?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kenneth I. Gross, Esq.
849 S BROADWAY APT 504LOS ANGELES, CA 90014-3232UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | costumes; undergarments; stockings; hosiery; and lingerie | ACTIVE | Mar 1, 2009 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 18, 2016 | PCBM | PETITION TO DIRECTOR WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 3, 2016 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Mar 15, 2016 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 26, 2016 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Feb 24, 2016 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 16, 2016 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Feb 9, 2016 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jan 27, 2016 | ERRS | TEAS REQUEST FOR REINSTATEMENT | — |
| Dec 10, 2015 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Dec 10, 2015 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Nov 28, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 27, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 27, 2015 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 28, 2015 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 28, 2015 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 28, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 6, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 5, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 5, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 15, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 15, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 15, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 7, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 4, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 29, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |