Drawing for SPOTLIGHT

USPTO serial 86348400

SPOTLIGHT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
THOMAS, JANICE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SPOTLIGHT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kristen L. Pursley

KRISTEN L. PURSLEY THE DOBRUSIN LAW FIRM, PC29 W LAWRENCE ST STE 210PONTIAC, MI 48342-2183UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Paperboard retail packaging; Paperboard packaging inserts for retail displays of cards, namely, gift cards, health cards, discount cards, loyalty cards, id cards, badges, business cards, fundraising cards, key cards, membership cards, download cards, promotional cards and rewards cards; Paperboard packaging inserts for holding CDs and DVDsACTIVE—
020Packaging containers of plastic for retail displays of cards, namely, gift cards, health cards, discount cards, loyalty cards, id cards, badges, business cards, fundraising cards, key cards, membership cards, download cards, promotional cards and rewards cards; Packaging containers of plastic for holding CDs and DVDsACTIVE—
040Printing of Custom PackagingACTIVE—
042Packaging Design Services, namely, design, and layout services of custom packagingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 3, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 3, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 30, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 5, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 5, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 15, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jun 1, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 1, 2015RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 29, 2015GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 29, 2015GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 29, 2015CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
May 12, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 11, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 11, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 12, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 12, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 12, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 7, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 4, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 29, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance