USPTO serial 86348488
BUONA STELLA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RAPPAPORT, SETH
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BUONA STELLA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
W. Indies, Charlestown, KN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Oliver A. Ruiz (a member of the Bar of the State of Florida)
OLIVER A. RUIZ (A MEMBER OF THE BAR OF THE STATE O MALLOY & MALLOY, P.L.2800 SW 3RD AVEMIAMI, FL 33129-2317UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | milk and milk products, namely, milk, skim milk, whole milk, condensed milk, cream, powdered milk, infant formula; cheeses and curds, namely, gouda, edam, fresh cheese, cream cheese, hard, provolone, manchego, etc.; dairy spreads, namely, cream, margarine; edible oils, namely, canola oil, soybean oil, olive oil, palm oil, sunflower oil, vegetable oil; edible fats; flakes, namely, oat flakes, corn flakes, chocolate flakes, oats; cereals; soybean products; food preparations of flour; pasta whether cooked, uncooked or stuffed, namely, spaghetti, macaroni, noodles, lasagna, etc.; fruits and vegetables, canned fruits and vegetables, namely, peaches, fruit cocktail, sliced pineapple, sliced and whole mushrooms, corn, asparagus, peas, sliced tomatoes, tomato pastes, artichokes, dry fruits, and any other edible parts of plants preserved or frozen; nuts and seeds, namely, dried nuts, sunflower seeds, etc.; beans, namely, chickpeas, black beans, canned beans, etc.; jams in different flavors; jellies; prepared or preserved fish, seafood, sardines, tuna, anchovies, mackerel, etc.; olives, namely, canned olives, black olives, green olives, Kalamata olives, in brine or preserved; palm hearts; gelatin in different flavors; coffee, namely, ground coffee, instant coffee; tea in different flavors, extracts, essences and concentrates, of tea or mate; vinegars, namely, balsamic vinegar, white vinegar, etc.; sausages of similar products, of meat, prepared or preserved meat, namely, sausage, cooked jam, bologna, salami, etc.; poultry and game; legumes preserved; frozen; dried and cooked cabbages, onions, potatoes, etc.; baked products, namely, sweet bread, cookies; spices and herbs, namely, ginger, saffron, etc.; sugar, sweeteners, artificial sweeteners; yogurts; natural honey; cocoa products, namely, chocolate, cocoa paste, cocoa butter, cocoa powder; salad dressings and sauces; rice and other grains; wheat products; beverages and juices; confectionary items; corn products | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 10, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 10, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 12, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 12, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 7, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 5, 2014 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 29, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |