USPTO serial 86348497
RISERBIND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TARCU, CATHERINE L
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - SENIOR ATTORNEY
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with RISERBIND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Rebecca E. McDougall
REBECCA E. MCDOUGALL Miles & Stockbridge P.C.1500 K Street NWSuite 800Washington, DC 20005Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Metal pipes; Fittings of metal, namely, metal hose fittings, metal joinery fittings; Well pipes, namely, metal drill pipes for use in well boring; Metal drilling templates for drilling holes; Metal piping systems comprising swivel joints, pipes, tubes, elbows, flanges, fluid couplings; Manifold structures, namely, manifolds of metal for pipelines; Metal reinforcement materials for building, namely, pipe supports of metal; Metal couplings for use with flexible composite pipes; Pipe couplings of metal; Metal coupling systems comprising metal seals and metal pipe supports; Metal fasteners, namely, clamp connectors | ACTIVE | — |
| 007 | Machines for connecting and disconnecting riser segments; Pumps for machines; Drilling equipment in the nature of Oil field equipment, namely, drilling rig mechanical handling machines and devices; Motors other than for land vehicles; Machine couplings and transmission components except for land vehicles; Machines parts for transport, distribution and administration of fluids, namely, fluid couplings being parts of machines and fluid drive couplings; Machines for transport, distribution and administration of fluids, namely, industrial fluid cleaning machinery; Valve installations, namely, valves as machine components; Valve blocks as parts of machines | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Means for control of fluids, namely, electronic valves for controlling fluids; Means for control of fluids, namely, expansion valves for fluid control; Scientific and electrical appliances and systems for control, testing and monitoring of drilling equipment, downhole functions, pressure, fluids, gas, namely, namely, gas flow monitors, electric monitoring apparatus, temperature sensors, pressure sensors and remote temperature sensors | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 21, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 9, 2017 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2017 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2017 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 8, 2017 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 20, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 20, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 14, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 14, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 31, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 2, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 10, 2015 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 4, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 27, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 17, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 23, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 23, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 23, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 22, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 4, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 29, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |