USPTO serial 86348671
BETTER FOR EVERYONE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EISNACH, MICHAEL PATRICK
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BETTER FOR EVERYONE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jill M. Pietrini
JILL M PIETRINI SHEPPARD MULLIN RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP1901 AVENUE OF THE STARSSTE 1600LOS ANGELES, CA 90067-6055Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Antipasto, beverages consisting principally of milk, bottled fruits, butter, cheese, dairy-based dips, dairy-based spreads, dried fruits, eggs, fruit and soy based snack food, fruit spreads, fruit-based meal replacement bars, fruit-based organic food bars, jellies and jams, jerky, meat, milk, olive oil, pate, peanut butter, pickles, poultry, prepared nuts, seafood not live, shakes, sliced meat, snack dips, soups, tofu, vegetable chips, yogurt-based beverages, condiments and snack foods, namely, artichoke paste, chili, olive paste, tapenade, vegetable condiments in the nature of vegetable-based spreads, condiment sauces, namely, vegetable based snackfoods | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 2, 2017 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Nov 2, 2017 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 7, 2017 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 6, 2017 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 6, 2017 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 6, 2017 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 23, 2017 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Aug 19, 2016 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Jul 28, 2016 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2016 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 1, 2016 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 8, 2016 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2016 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2016 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 16, 2016 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 16, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 9, 2016 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 3, 2016 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 3, 2016 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 18, 2015 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Nov 18, 2015 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 11, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 10, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 20, 2015 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 20, 2015 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 13, 2015 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 9, 2015 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 9, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 9, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 11, 2014 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Dec 10, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 2, 2014 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 12, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 12, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 7, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 4, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 29, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |