USPTO serial 86350162
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrew N. Kovar
ANDREW N KOVAR TRIPLETT WOOLF & GARRETSON LLC2959 N ROCK RDSTE 300WICHITA, KS 67226-5100| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Providing an interactive web site featuring technology that enables users to visualize and design residential, office, and commercial rooms with flooring products, namely, carpet, hard wood, laminate, vinyl, luxury vinyl tile, and tile | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2015 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 20, 2015 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 20, 2015 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 20, 2015 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 9, 2015 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 11, 2015 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 13, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 24, 2014 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 9, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 25, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 25, 2014 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 25, 2014 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2014 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2014 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 17, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 17, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 17, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 10, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 6, 2014 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 31, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |