Drawing for CHEMOPROTECT

USPTO serial 86350233

CHEMOPROTECT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
AYALA, LOURDES
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CHEMOPROTECT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Joseph A. Sebolt

Joseph A. Sebolt Sand & Sebolt4940 Munson Street, NWAegis Tower, Suite 1100Canton, OH 44718

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010medical products used for chemotherapy, namely, gowns, gloves, overgloves, overshoes, arm sleeves, spill boxes for collecting gowns, gloves, overgloves, overshoes, arm sleeves, respiratory masks, work place covers used on table and counter surfaces to absorb spills during the preparation of cytotoxic drugs; respiratory masksACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 17, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 17, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 10, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Feb 9, 2018EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED
Feb 5, 2018EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED
Feb 5, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 20, 2017ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 20, 2017REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Jun 24, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Jun 22, 2017EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Jun 22, 2017EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Jun 22, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 19, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Jan 17, 2017EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Jan 17, 2017EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Jan 17, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 12, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Aug 11, 2016EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Aug 5, 2016EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Aug 5, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 8, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Jan 6, 2016EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Jan 6, 2016EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Jan 6, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 10, 2015NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED
Dec 9, 2015DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE
Nov 25, 2015AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Nov 9, 2015DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED
Nov 9, 2015ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED
Aug 11, 2015NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 16, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Jun 16, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 27, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
May 9, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
May 9, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
May 7, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
May 7, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 7, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 13, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 13, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 13, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 12, 2014DMCCDATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED
Nov 12, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Nov 10, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 6, 2014MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED
Aug 5, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Jul 31, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance