USPTO serial 86351598
MINT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FERRAIUOLO, DOMINIC
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MINT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
LAS VEGAS, NV
Las Vegas, NV
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Non-magnetically encoded gift cards; Non-magnetically encoded prepaid purchase cards for allowing users to purchase digital goods or services from merchants via an on-line payment platform | ACTIVE | Mar 17, 2014 |
| 036 | Financial services, namely, funding online cash accounts from prepaid cash cards, bank accounts and credit card accounts; Financial services, namely, providing a virtual currency for use by members of an on-line community via a global computer network; Financial services, namely, providing electronic transfer of a virtual currency for use by members of an on-line community via a global computer network; Financial services, namely, providing on-line stored value accounts in an electronic environment; Issuing stored value cards; On-line prepaid card services; Pre-paid purchase card services, namely, processing electronic payments made through prepaid cards; Prepaid card services in the nature of making payment for adding airtime to prepaid or pay-as-you-go wireless services; Processing electronic payments made through prepaid cards; Providing stored value card services; Stored value prepaid card services, namely, processing electronic payments made through prepaid cards | ACTIVE | Mar 17, 2014 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 7, 2018 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Jan 2, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 2, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 6, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 5, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 2, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 2, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 27, 2017 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 27, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 26, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 12, 2016 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Jun 6, 2016 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 3, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 30, 2015 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 13, 2015 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Oct 13, 2015 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| May 21, 2015 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 4, 2015 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 20, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 12, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 6, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 1, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |