USPTO serial 86351764
OSPREYDATA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GOLDEN, LAURA DAWN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with OSPREYDATA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Juan Capistrano, CA
San Juan Capistrano, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mei Tsang
MEI TSANG FISH & TSANG LLP2603 MAIN ST STE 1000IRVINE, CA 92614-4271UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Software programs for synthesizing, reading, diagnosing and analyzing data related to machine parts and machine system operations; heavy machinery diagnostic apparatus and parts thereof, namely, memory cards, electronic sensors for receiving diagnostic information in high-value industrial assets, electronic submersible pumps, rod pumps, and compressors, and machine-based electronic modules for transmitting diagnostic information and machine operational status, all for use in the upstream oil and gas industry for artificial lift and oil production | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Business data management and analysis in the field of industrial equipment and industrial plants | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Monitoring of industrial equipment and industrial plants for quality control purposes; software as a service (SAAS) services, namely, hosting software for use by others for synthesizing, reading, diagnosing and analyzing data related to machine parts and machine system operations | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by OspreyData, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by OspreyData, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named OSPREYDATA
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 3, 2016 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 3, 2016 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 26, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2016 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 24, 2016 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 8, 2016 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 7, 2016 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Mar 7, 2016 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 7, 2016 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 1, 2016 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 1, 2015 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 7, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 17, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 20, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 28, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 28, 2015 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 28, 2015 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2015 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2015 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 9, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 8, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 8, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 18, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 18, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 18, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 11, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 7, 2014 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 1, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |