USPTO serial 86353023
HIGH THERE!
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICHELI, ANGELA M
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HIGH THERE!?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daniel S. Polley
DANIEL S. POLLEY DANIEL S. POLLEY, P.A.7251 W PALMETTO PARK RD STE 202BOCA RATON, FL 33433-3487UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 024 | Towels; beach towels; bedding, namely, bed linens, blankets, pillowcases, sheets, quilts, bedspreads, comforters | ACTIVE | — |
| 034 | Lighters for smokers; smoking articles and smoking accessories, namely, hookahs, flavored tobacco, herbal molasses, electronic hookahs, electronic cigarettes, electronic cigarette liquids, electronic smoking vaporizers, lighters, hookah charcoals, electronic hookah liquids; rolling trays, cigarette rolling machines, ashtrays, cigarette boxes, cigarette lighters, matches, matchboxes, tobacco tins, pipes, bongs, water pipes; smokeless cigarette vaporizer pipe; flavourings, other than essential oils, for tobacco; flavourings, other than essential oils, for use in electronic cigarettes; liquid nicotine solutions for use in electronic cigarettes; oral vaporizers for smokers; tobacco; tobacco pipes; filter tips; smoking products, namely, cigars; cigarette paper; cigarette rolling paper | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | On-line retail store services featuring company owned clothing, footwear and headwear and not third party clothing, footwear, headwear and fashion accessories; on-line retail store services featuring tobacco related products, namely, smoker's articles, hookahs, flavored tobacco, herbal molasses, electronic hookahs, electronic cigarettes, electronic cigarette liquids, electronic smoking vaporizers, lighters, hookah charcoals, electronic hookah liquids and hookah accessories; retail and wholesale store services featuring tobacco related products, namely, smoker's articles, hookahs, flavored tobacco, herbal molasses, electronic hookahs, electronic cigarettes, electronic cigarette liquids, lighters, hookah charcoals, electronic hookah liquids, hookah accessories, rolling paper, cigars, rolling trays, cigarette rolling machines, ashtrays, cigarette papers, cigarette boxes, cigarette lighters, matches, matchboxes, tobacco tins, pipes, bongs, water pipes, smokeless cigarette vaporizer pipe, flavourings for tobacco, flavourings for use in electronic cigarettes, liquid nicotine solutions for use in electronic cigarettes, oral vaporizers for smokers, tobacco, tobacco pipes, filter tips and other tobacco and smoking related products and paraphernalia, towels, beach towels and bedding, on-line retail store services featuring vaporizers, electronic cigarettes, eliquids and cartridges and accessories for vaporizers and electronic cigarettes; informational website, namely, providing a website featuring information about consumer and industry information about cannabis, marijuana and hemp | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Green Mile Holdings, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Green Mile Holdings, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Other trademarks in Class 034
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named HIGH THERE!
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 23, 2019 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 23, 2019 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 22, 2019 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2019 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 15, 2019 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 2, 2019 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 2, 2019 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| May 23, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2019 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 21, 2019 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 21, 2019 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 30, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 22, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2018 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 20, 2018 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 23, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2018 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 21, 2018 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 21, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 21, 2017 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 26, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 6, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2017 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 4, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 22, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 21, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 21, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 8, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 8, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 8, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 6, 2017 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 17, 2017 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jan 4, 2017 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 10, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 8, 2016 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 8, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 8, 2016 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 5, 2016 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Nov 27, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 27, 2016 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 23, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 23, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 27, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 27, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 27, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 2016 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 1, 2016 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Feb 18, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 12, 2016 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 11, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 11, 2016 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 11, 2016 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2016 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2016 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 7, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 7, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 5, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 15, 2015 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 15, 2015 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 15, 2015 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 15, 2015 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 15, 2015 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2015 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 15, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 21, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 20, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 20, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 20, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 20, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 20, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 13, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 7, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 2, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |