Drawing for PROGRESSIVE FARMS

USPTO serial 86353672

PROGRESSIVE FARMS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CLYBURN, CARLA DIONNE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PROGRESSIVE FARMS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Thomas G. Varnum

THOMAS G. VARNUM BROOKS, PIERCE, MCLENDON, HUMPHREY & LEONARD, LLP115 N 3RD ST STE 301WILMINGTON, NC 28401-4076UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
031Fresh fruit and vegetablesACTIVEApr 9, 2014

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 9, 2015MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Dec 9, 2015ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Dec 8, 2015EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Jun 15, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 15, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 15, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 11, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 20, 2014GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 20, 2014GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 20, 2014CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Nov 14, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 8, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 4, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance