Drawing for 12

USPTO serial 86353936

12

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CHANG, KATHERINE S
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with 12?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Nancy V. Stephens

NANCY V STEPHENS FOSTER PEPPER PLLC1111 3RD AVESUITE 3400SEATTLE, WA 98101-3264

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
043Restaurant and bar servicesACTIVEAug 30, 2011

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 9, 2018UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Jan 18, 2018MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 17, 2018ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 17, 2018EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 3, 2017EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Aug 21, 2017GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 21, 2017GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 21, 2017CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Jul 7, 2017JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 17, 2017EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jan 29, 2016GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jan 29, 2016GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jan 29, 2016CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jan 5, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 4, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 4, 2016ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Dec 2, 2015GNS1NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Dec 2, 2015GNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED—
Dec 2, 2015CNCFACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED—
Nov 21, 2015EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Nov 21, 2015JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 20, 2015ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Nov 20, 2015EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
May 21, 2015GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
May 21, 2015GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 21, 2015CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 1, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 30, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 30, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 31, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 31, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 31, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 31, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 9, 2014MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Aug 8, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 4, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance