USPTO serial 86354887
BY HARTLEY & MARKS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NGUYEN, NICOLE ASHLEY
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BY HARTLEY & MARKS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Trisha A. Doré
TRISHA A. DORÉ ACCUPRO TRADEMARK SERVICES LLPSUITE 702 - 401 WEST GEORGIA STREETVANCOUVER, BC, V6B5A1CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Stationery, namely, paper for use in looseleaf binders, photo albums, and notebooks; Blank journals, notebooks, log books, photo albums, guestbooks, day planners and binders; pre-printed, books, namely, a series of non-fictional books in the field of aphorisms, self-help and philosophy | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Book publishing, magazine publishing; Online electronic publishing of books and periodicals, publishing of web magazines, publishing of electronic publications | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 18, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 18, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 17, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 17, 2015 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 8, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 6, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 6, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 1, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 26, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 26, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 26, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 26, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 17, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 12, 2014 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 5, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |