Drawing for STITZEL-WELLER

USPTO serial 86356231

STITZEL-WELLER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PARADEWELAI, BENJI YUEN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with STITZEL-WELLER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Paola Tornabene

Paola Tornabene Diageo North America, Inc.175 Greenwich StreetThree World Trade CenterNew York, NY 20007

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Paper, posters, photographs, stationery; printed matter, namely, newsletters and brochures all in the fields of alcoholic beverages and distillation of alcoholic beverages; Coasters of paperACTIVE—
021Coasters not of paper and not being table linenACTIVE—
025T-shirts, caps, hatsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 10, 2020MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 10, 2020ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 6, 2019CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Dec 6, 2019COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Dec 6, 2019ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 6, 2019REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 9, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 8, 2019EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Apr 5, 2019EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Apr 5, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 9, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 5, 2018EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Oct 5, 2018EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Oct 5, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 25, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 24, 2018EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Aug 20, 2018NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Aug 20, 2018TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Aug 20, 2018PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Aug 20, 2018PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Aug 13, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 13, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 10, 2018EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jan 26, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 26, 2018NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Jan 25, 2018EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jan 25, 2018DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jan 22, 2018AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jan 10, 2018EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jan 10, 2018DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jan 10, 2018ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Jan 10, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 8, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 6, 2017EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 6, 2017EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 6, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 10, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 23, 2016TMBNTTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS—
Nov 23, 2016OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Nov 23, 2016OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Jul 2, 2015OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jul 2, 2015OPPFOPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jun 9, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 9, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 20, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
May 4, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 4, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 10, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 9, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 8, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 8, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 31, 2015TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 4, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 4, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 4, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 29, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 13, 2014MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Aug 12, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 7, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance