USPTO serial 86356608
KIPLING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GILLES, DEBORAH LYNN MEINERS
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with KIPLING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kia H. Wimmer
PAUL J KENNEDY PEPPER HAMILTON LLP3000 TWO LOGAN SQUAREEIGHTEENTH AND ARCH STREETSPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-2799Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Cases for spectacles and sunglasses; Chains for spectacles and for sunglasses; Eye glasses; Eyeglass cases; Eyeglass chains and cords; Eyeglass frames; Eyeglass lenses; Eyeglasses; Eyewear; Eyewear cases; Frames for spectacles and sunglasses; Sunglasses and spectacles; bags for laptops; tablet sleeves; laptop sleeves; cases for cellphones; bicycle helmets | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 13, 2018 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 12, 2018 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 12, 2018 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 28, 2018 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Aug 28, 2017 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2017 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2017 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 16, 2017 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Jun 6, 2017 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2017 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2017 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| May 12, 2017 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 20, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 17, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 1, 2016 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2016 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2016 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 12, 2016 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 19, 2016 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 19, 2016 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Dec 17, 2015 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2015 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 17, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 25, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 24, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 24, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 24, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 1, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 1, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 1, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 1, 2015 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 1, 2015 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2015 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2015 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 7, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 16, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 16, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 16, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 16, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 16, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 16, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 9, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 12, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 7, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |