USPTO serial 86356676
REVEAL BEAUTÉ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DUBOIS, SUSAN L
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with REVEAL BEAUTÉ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Hallandale Beach, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Oliver A. Ruiz (a member of the Bar of the State of Florida)
OLIVER A. RUIZ (A MEMBER OF THE BAR OF THE STATE O MALLOY & MALLOY, P.L.2800 SW 3RD AVEMIAMI, FL 33129-2317UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | brow care products, namely, eye brow powders, eyebrow pencils, eyebrow setters, eyebrow tools; skin care products, namely skin creams, non-medicated skin serums, body wash, body lotions, body oils, gels and lotions for cosmetic purposes, namely exfoliating skin | ACTIVE | — |
| 008 | tweezers kits comprised of tweezers and skin creams | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
| 021 | cosmetic brushes for eye brows | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 24, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 24, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 18, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 18, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 17, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 14, 2014 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 7, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |