Drawing for LITTLE BIGS SLIDERS SHAKES FRIES AND REALLY GOOD WINE ORDER IN THREES

USPTO serial 86356844

LITTLE BIGS SLIDERS SHAKES FRIES AND REALLY GOOD WINE ORDER IN THREES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MIZELLE HOWARD, DEZMONA JULYE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LITTLE BIGS SLIDERS SHAKES FRIES AND REALLY GOOD WINE ORDER IN THREES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Collin A. Rose

COLLIN A ROSE CHAMBERLAIN HRDLICKA WHITE WILLIAMS & AUGHTRY1200 SMITH ST FL 14HOUSTON, TX 77002-4317UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Restaurant servicesACTIVEFeb 1, 2009

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 20, 2016MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 6, 2016ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 6, 2016EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 22, 2016EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Feb 8, 2016GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Feb 8, 2016GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Feb 8, 2016CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jan 13, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 13, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 9, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 18, 2015ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Dec 18, 2015EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Dec 18, 2015JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 18, 2015EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jun 18, 2015GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jun 18, 2015GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 18, 2015CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 27, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 26, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 26, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 24, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 24, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 24, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 18, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 13, 2014MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Aug 12, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 7, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance