Drawing for SELF I E

USPTO serial 86356867

SELF I E

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
JAGANNATHAN, SIDDHARTH
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SELF I E?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Charles T. Riggs Jr.

CHARLES T RIGGS JR LAW OFFICE OF CHARLES T RIGGS JR551 FOREST AVERIVER FOREST, IL 60305-1707UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer application software for mobile phones, tablets and computers, namely, software for the collection, editing, organizing, modifying, book marking, transmission, storage and sharing of digital images, data and informationACTIVEApr 25, 2012

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 9, 2016MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 7, 2016ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 7, 2016EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 7, 2016EXDMEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED AS MOOT—
Jul 6, 2016GNS1NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Jul 6, 2016GNSFSUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Jul 6, 2016CFRCSUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN—
Jul 1, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 30, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 30, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 31, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 31, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 31, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 30, 2015ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Dec 30, 2015EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Dec 30, 2015JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 30, 2015EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jun 30, 2015GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jun 30, 2015GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 30, 2015CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 16, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 15, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 15, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 16, 2014GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Dec 16, 2014GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Dec 16, 2014CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Dec 15, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 17, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 13, 2014MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Aug 12, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 7, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance