USPTO serial 86356970
EAST END FENCE AND GATE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HWANG, JOHN C B
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EAST END FENCE AND GATE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Hampton Bays, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Alexander Guzman
ALEXANDER GUZMAN LAW FIRM OF ALEXANDER GUZMAN P.C.145 W 85TH ST APT 5BNEW YORK, NY 10024-4429UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | Non-metal chainlink fences; Non-metal chainlink fencing; Non-metal fence panels; Non-metal fence posts; Non-metal fence stays; Non-metal fencing in the nature of an industrial safety barrier; Non-metal fencing panels; Non-metal fencing stays; Non-metal gates and fences; Non-metal gates and fencing; Non-metal gates and fencing panels; Non-metal railings for fences, gates, pergolas, arbors; Non-metal wire fencing; Wooden fencing in the nature of a noise barrier | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 1, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 1, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 20, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 20, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 20, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 20, 2014 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 20, 2014 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2014 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2014 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 17, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 12, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 7, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |