USPTO serial 86356984
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Roger W. Blakely, Jr.
ROGER W. BLAKELY, JR. BLAKELY SOKOLOFF TAYLOR & ZAFMAN LLP12400 WILSHIRE BLVD FL 7LOS ANGELES, CA 90025-1019UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | flat and curved panel display screens; gallium nitride substrates, solid-state 2D light based emissive imagers and 3D light field emissive imagers; solid-state 2D sensor arrays for cameras, and 3D light field photo sensor arrays for light field cameras; 2D and 3D movie, multimedia, photographic, slide and video projectors; 2D and 3D cameras; networked 2D and 3D cameras; networked 2D and 3D movie, multimedia, photographic, slide and video projectors; networked 2D and 3D LCD large screen displays; software for computer networking; software for 2D and 3D image processing, compression, transmission and reconstruction; solid state micro-array light emitters, namely, for projectors and displays; micro-array lenses, namely, optical lenses for 2D and 3D cameras, light field modulators and light field cameras; solar cells; light emitting diodes and laser diodes | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | patent, trademark, copyright, trade secret and computer software licensing regarding the design, manufacturing and use of flat and curved panel displays, gallium nitride substrates, solid-state 2D emissive imagers and 3D light field emissive imagers and solid-state 2D sensor arrays and 3D light field photo sensor arrays, 2D and 3D projectors and 2D and 3D cameras, networked 2D and 3D cameras, projectors and displays and software for such networking, software for 2D and 3D image processing, compression, transmission and image reconstruction, solid state micro-array light emitters, micro-array lenses, solar cells, light emitting diodes and laser diodes | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 31, 2016 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 31, 2016 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 13, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2016 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 11, 2016 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 9, 2016 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 29, 2015 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 4, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 15, 2015 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 30, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 29, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 22, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 22, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 12, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 11, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 1, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 27, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 28, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 26, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 17, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 13, 2014 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 7, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |